Lou M: So many assumptions, and the report isn’t public yet. According to Barr, Mueller makes the case for and against obstruction.
Going to Getugly: First of all… this was about Russian collusion. That was what this was all suppose to prove. It turned out to be a lie. And everyone who didn’t abandon independent critical thinking in favour of conforming to the most fashionable group-think one could possibly subscribe to all recognized it was a lie from the start. And now all of the people who uncritically bought into the Russian collusion lie are defaulting to the standard tactic that Leftists always rely on when they’ve been proven to be naive, easily manipulated and wrong…. they are instantly dropping the claim they’ve breathlessly supported for two years, they’re acting like it never happened and they are all simply moving on to the official NEW claim to validate their preferred conclusions… ‘it is now and has always been about “obstruction!“… which they’re all once again breathlessly supporting.
The assumption you are all relying on is that being completely wrong for two years about something that you were absolutely certain you were right about has no bearing on the credibility of your perspective going forward.
As much as you would like to believe that.. it isn’t true. You have proven yourselves to be incapable of adequately discerning what is true from what is false. So when you replace your certainty about “collusion” with your new certainty about “obstruction” you have no credibility whatsoever.
Comentários